Iron Rhine gets renewed political attention in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany

Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany are accelerating talks to revive the Iron Rhine railway, a 19th-century line linking the Port of Antwerp with Germany’s Ruhr industrial region, amid mounting concerns over security in Europe and the need to strengthen military mobility in response to Russia.

The Iron Rhine was once a crucial artery for trade and, during and after World War II, played a pivotal role for Allied forces. However, the line fell into disuse in the decades that followed and has been largely dormant since 1991, with parts abandoned altogether. 

Renewed attention now comes as the European Union seeks to address capacity pressures on other freight corridors and prioritises rail connections suitable for military as well as commercial transport.

Belgium has placed the project high on its political agenda, with Prime Minister Bart De Wever (N-VA) personally overseeing negotiations. Officials in Brussels argue that reactivating the line would both bolster Antwerp’s position as a gateway port and contribute to NATO and EU goals on strategic mobility. 

The Belgian transport ministry has described the scheme as a political project, reflecting its importance for national and European priorities.

The Netherlands

The Netherlands, by contrast, has been markedly less enthusiastic. Its section of the railway is relatively short and runs parallel to the modern Betuwe freight line, which already links Rotterdam to Germany. Dutch officials also view the Iron Rhine as potentially enhancing Antwerp’s competitiveness at the expense of Rotterdam, long the dominant port in the region. 

Analysts have noted that Dutch cooperation is essential, since the Netherlands controls a critical section of the route. They also point out that the country is likely to cooperate only if the financial or political costs are low.

Financial considerations could prove decisive. NATO’s updated spending targets and the European Commission’s proposal to allocate €17 billion for military mobility in the EU’s next long-term budget, beginning in 2027, may provide the necessary incentives. 

Analysts suggest that substantial EU funding could persuade the Netherlands to support the project despite its reluctance.

Disputes over the Iron Rhine are not new. In 2003, Belgium and the Netherlands took their differences to an arbitration tribunal, which ruled that Belgium had the right to proceed with reactivation but would bear the environmental costs, with Dutch contributions required only if they directly benefitted. Environmental and planning issues remain a complicating factor today.

Germany is broadly supportive of the project, though its section poses the greatest engineering challenges. The terrain around Aachen is difficult, and memories linger of the collapse of the Rastatt tunnel in 2017, which highlighted vulnerabilities in Europe’s rail network. Nevertheless, Berlin is seen as willing to facilitate progress.

For Belgium, the hope is that the strategic and security imperative will finally overcome decades of political hesitation. With discussions now moving forward at pace, the Iron Rhine — once a dormant relic of Europe’s industrial and wartime past — may yet regain its role as a vital link in both trade and defence.

More on night trains and transcontinental train travel

Channel Tunnel updates

33 Comments Add yours

Leave a comment