The European Commission wants to make international train travel in Europe much simpler. Its newly unveiled Passenger Package promises easier booking, stronger passenger rights and more seamless cross-border journeys. In theory, the reforms could finally bring European rail travel closer to the convenience passengers already expect from air travel.

But while the Commission’s intentions have been widely welcomed, the details of the proposals are already generating intense debate among passenger groups, independent ticketing platforms and railway experts. Critics argue that the reforms solve some long-standing problems while simultaneously creating new layers of complexity.

Two of the most detailed critiques so far have come from the European Rail Passengers Union and independent railway commentator Jon Worth. Both broadly support the goal of easier booking and stronger passenger rights, but argue that the Commission has chosen an unnecessarily complicated and potentially unworkable way to achieve it.

The two major problems the EU wants to solve

The Commission is trying to address two longstanding weaknesses in European rail travel: fragmented ticketing and inconsistent passenger rights.

Booking cross-border train journeys in Europe can still be remarkably difficult. Many booking platforms only show tickets from operators they directly cooperate with. Some routes appear more expensive than they actually are, while others do not appear at all.

Passengers often need to search multiple websites, compare separate tickets themselves and manually determine whether connections are realistic. A journey involving several countries may require buying tickets from several operators separately.

The situation becomes even more problematic when disruptions occur.

Under current European Union passenger rights legislation, many protections only apply if the journey is sold as a so-called “through-ticket“. That means multiple trains are treated as part of one transport contract. If a delay causes a missed connection, the railway company remains responsible for rerouting or compensation.

The problem is that through-tickets are often unavailable on international journeys involving multiple operators. As a result, passengers may lose protection simply because their trip was split across separate bookings.

The Commission’s solution: the “single ticket”

To solve both problems simultaneously, the Commission has built the new package around a newly created concept called the “single ticket“.

Under the proposal, different tickets from multiple railway operators could be combined into one protected booking , but only if they are purchased together in a single transaction through a compatible platform.

The Commission also wants railway companies to make their tickets available to independent resellers under fair and non-discriminatory conditions. Dominant national booking platforms such as SNCF Connect or DB Navigator would face additional obligations to display competitors’ services and, in some cases, sell rival operators’ tickets directly.

In practice, this could make it much easier for passengers to book complex international journeys in one place.

For example, a future journey from Frankfurt to Barcelona involving Deutsche Bahn, SNCF and Renfe could potentially be purchased as one protected booking rather than three separate tickets.

If delays caused missed connections, passengers would receive rights covering the entire journey, including rerouting and compensation.

Why critics say the system may not work

Passenger organisations and rail experts argue that the Commission has made one key mistake: tying passenger rights to how tickets are purchased rather than to the journey itself.

The European Rail Passengers Union argues that rights should apply whenever passengers follow recognised minimum connection times, regardless of whether tickets were bought together, separately, through one platform or across multiple transactions.

According to the group, the Commission’s proposal risks creating a fragmented system where only some journeys qualify for protection.

Passengers may only receive full rights if:

• all relevant tickets are available on the same platform;
• they purchase everything in one transaction;
• the booking platform supports all operators involved;
• and all ticketing systems are technically compatible.

Critics warn that many real-world journeys will still fall outside the system.

Problems for regular rail travellers

One of the strongest criticisms concerns frequent rail users rather than occasional holidaymakers.

Many passengers already rely on subscription products, national rail passes and discount cards. Examples include Austria’s Klimaticket, Germany’s Deutschlandticket or operator-specific reduction cards such as BahnCard and Carte Avantage in France.

Under the current proposal, it remains unclear how those products could be integrated into a protected “single ticket”.

Imagine a passenger already holding a BahnCard discount for German trains and a French discount card for SNCF services. If no booking platform can combine both discounts into one transaction, the traveller may face a choice: either lose passenger rights protection or pay more for a less flexible booking.

The same issue applies to passengers who book parts of a journey separately because tickets become available at different times.

A traveller might want to secure a high-demand international train months in advance while waiting for domestic tickets to go on sale later. But if tickets are not bought together in one transaction, the current proposal may deny full rights protection.

According to critics, the system appears designed around passengers who book one annual international trip from start to finish in a single sitting, rather than the reality of how many experienced rail travellers actually travel.

The hidden technical challenge: booking horizons

One of the less visible but potentially most difficult problems involves booking horizons: the timing of when operators release tickets for sale.

Rail companies across Europe currently use very different booking schedules. Some release tickets six months ahead, others only weeks in advance.

If journeys need to be assembled into protected “single tickets”, operators may effectively need much more coordinated ticket release systems.

Critics warn that forcing alignment across Europe’s fragmented rail market could require expensive technical integration and major operational changes.

The Commission’s proposal attempts to address this issue, but both passenger groups and industry observers remain sceptical about how smoothly such coordination could work in practice.

Debate over ticketing platforms and competition

The package also introduces controversial rules for booking platforms.

Dominant state-owned platforms such as DB Navigator or SNCF Connect may be required to display and sell competitors’ tickets.

Supporters say this would prevent national operators from hiding rival services and improve competition.

However, some independent ticketing platforms worry the rules could become overly prescriptive.

Stefan Lindbohm of Railfinder has criticised provisions that could dictate how booking platforms sort and filter results. According to Lindbohm, this could unintentionally ban innovative features such as Railfinder’s ‘Best’ sorting system, which prioritises comfort and overall journey quality rather than simply fastest travel times.

He warned that smaller technical provisions risk undermining the broader goals of the reform.

An alternative approach: rights first, ticketing second

Both the European Rail Passengers Union and Jon Worth argue that the EU may be approaching the problem from the wrong direction.

Instead of building passenger rights around a new ticketing construct, they propose guaranteeing rights independently of how tickets are purchased.

Under this alternative model, passengers would receive protection whenever their journey respects recognised minimum connection times. Railway companies would remain responsible for assisting passengers during disruptions, regardless of how many tickets or operators are involved.

Supporters say this would dramatically simplify the legislation.

Ticketing reform could then focus purely on improving access to fares and opening railway data to independent booking platforms, without requiring every possible journey to be sold as one unified ticket.

Importantly, critics argue that versions of this system already exist informally through voluntary agreements between railway companies, such as Hop on the next available train (HOTNAT)and the Agreement on Journey Continuation (AJC). The proposal would essentially formalise and strengthen existing cooperation rather than forcing entirely new ticketing structures onto operators.

What happens next?

The Passenger Package is still only at the beginning of the EU legislative process.

The proposals now move to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, where member states and MEPs can amend the legislation extensively.

That means many of the most controversial elements, including the “single ticket” concept, the one-transaction requirement and obligations on dominant ticketing platforms, could still change substantially.

For now, the debate highlights a broader tension at the heart of European rail policy: how to make cross-border rail travel feel seamless for passengers while working within a railway system that remains fragmented along national, technical and commercial lines.

More on cross-border trains

• Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies unhappy with European Commission’s Passenger Package.
• NS will not run EuroCity trains to and from Eindhoven to Brussels.
• Deutsche Bahn, DSB and Vy present direct Berlin to Oslo route, from summer 2028.
• European Rail Passengers Union: EU must act now to make cross-border rail travel seamless, fair, and green: passengers demand guaranteed rights and simpler ticketing.
• NETHERLANDS | The Hague aims to become Europe’s gateway with direct links to Brussels, Berlin, and Paris.
• GoVolta to launch Amsterdam – Antwerp – Ghent – Paris route on 14 December as Berlin services expand and Hamburg link ends.
• European Sleeper sets out vision for 40-route night train network across Europe, including London.
• RAIL BALTICA | Elron, Vivi, and LTG Link launch joint tender for regional trains.
• Trenitalia / FS Group advances Paris hub to power European high-speed expansion, looking at Belgium and the Netherlands in the long term.
• Train Charter Services replaces Keolis as operator for GoVolta trains.
• European Sleeper adds Aulnoye-Aymeries, Mons, and Liège-Guillemins to Paris-Brussels-Berlin night train service.
• DEUTSCHE BAHN | First ICE service to the Belgian North Sea coast, at Ostend, this summer.
• Deutsche Bahn ICE 1110 and 1111 to connect Cologne and Ostend on weekends from 6 June to end of summer 2026.
• European Sleeper postpones Brussels–Cologne–Zurich–Milan night train to 9 September 2026.
• Brussels Airlines and Deutsche Bahn team up for Antwerp – Brussels Airport – Liège – Cologne ICE codeshare.
• Deutsche Bahn confirms Cologne – Brussels Airport – Antwerp ICE connection from September 2026.
• Trenitalia unveils €2 billion investment plan and orders 74 new Frecciarossa high-speed trains.
• Belgium and the Netherlands work on Brussels to Eindhoven direct train, possibly via Antwerp.
• Belgian Mobility Minister wants to revive direct train service to Switzerland.
• NETHERLANDS | Arriva will not launch the Groningen to Paris service in 2026.
• Snälltåget to run Stockholm – Malmö – Copenhagen – Hamburg day trains from May 2026.
• Nox night trains: a smart new cabin concept or just an unachievable dream?.
• How firm are Eurostar and Deutsche Bahn’s “2030s” Germany to London train link plans?.
• Leo Express files plans for extraordinary 2026 Bratislava–Ostend and Venice–Northern Germany services.
• Rail should be functional, not fine art: EU leaders call for standardisation and lower costs.
• Subsidies for night trains? “You cannot fix this until someone builds more sleeper and couchette carriages”.
• Leo Express and Arenaways plan direct train between Prague and Venice.
• Italo targets the German high-speed rail market.
• Trenitalia eyes expansion into Germany’s high-speed trains market.
• European Commission wants to link all EU capitals by high-speed train by 2040… and that’s not going to happen.
• Travellers in Europe increasingly open to choosing trains over planes for short-haul journeys.
• REVIEW | European Sleeper night train.
• Paris Nightjet axed: France’s withdrawal threatens Europe’s night train revival.
• 2026 | Deutsche Bahn plans 4 ICE’s per day between Cologne and Antwerp and 16 per day between Frankfurt and Brussels.
• Iron Rhine gets renewed political attention in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany.
• ÖBB prioritises Railjet over Nightjet: Is the night train revival a False Dawn?.
• EUROPEAN SLEEPER | Brussels to Barcelona night train to stop in Avignon, Montpellier, Narbonne, and Girona.
• Trenitalia, Deutsche Bahn and ÖBB launch Frecciarossa EuroCity trains linking Berlin, Munich, Milan, Rome and Naples.
• EU train travel report sees increase in cross-border passenger trains and easier bookings.
• Brussels to Luxembourg by train under 2 hours by 2030?.
• Eurostar and five more train operators joined the European Agreement on Journey Continuation.
• ÖBB’s new Nightjet sleeper cars accommodate solo travellers with Mini Cabins.
• EUROCITY EC-8 | Basel to Cologne in SBB’s Panoramic Car.
• REVIEW | Trenitalia Frecciarossa 1000 Paris – Milan in Business Executive.
• RAIL TOUR OF EUROPE | How easy is touring Europe by train?.
• Eight train connections between the Netherlands and Belgium by 2030?.
• REVIEW | ÖBB Nightjet Amsterdam – Zurich night train.
• Nightjet Vienna/Innsbruck to Brussels, or how we got thrown off the train in Aachen.
• Why the expensive ÖBB Nightjet is really not that expensive.
• Ticket Distribution: the failure of railways to sell themselves.
• To use night trains in Portugal and Spain or not?.
• Night trains in Europe.
• Low-cost, long-haul trains to conquer Europe?.
• Fly now before it’s taxed and consider using the train instead.

Channel Tunnel updates

• Switzerland – United Kingdom direct train moves closer as SBB-CFF-FFS, SNCF Voyageurs and Eurostar sign memorandum of understanding.
• A London-bound Eurostar terminal at Antwerp-Central? Highly unlikely!.
• Trenitalia (FS Group) and Certares agree strategic partnership to expand international high-speed rail operations.
• #CROSSCHANNELRAIL | Expanding UK-Europe train links most realistically leading to Switzerland.
• CHANNEL TUNNEL | Virgin Trains gains access to Temple Mills, ORR snubs links to Germany and Switzerland.
• Eurostar unveils €2 billion Alstom ‘Celestia’ fleet of double-decker sustainable trains.
• Gemini Trains partners with Uber for Stratford to France Channel Tunnel route.
• Eurostar and St. Pancras Highspeed back major station expansion to double capacity amid growing international demand.
• EUROSTAR | London – Frankfurt, London – Geneva and Amsterdam – Antwerp – Brussels – Geneva from 2030?.
• Alstom wants its double-decker trains to ride through Channel Tunnel.
• London St. Pancras Highspeed pledges financial support for cross-Channel rail services.
• London St Pancras Highspeed and Getlink aspire to to triple train services to France, Belgium and the Netherlands and add services to Germany and Switzerland.
• Heuro wants to operate high speeds trains between Amsterdam, Antwerp, Brussels, Paris and London from 2028.